Feature Requests

In some cases, as a result of human error, proposals are not set up properly. For instance, quorum may be set wrong on a proposal, leading Snapshot to display the proposal as having passed, when according to the user's actual intention, it should not have passed. One easy way to solve this would be to allow admins to add comments or annotations to closed proposals, so that people looking at the record can see not only the voting record, but annotations to explain any errors. (One might also want to allow voting wallets to add comments, or to allow comments in general, but letting admins add comments should be enough.)

Request to integrate support for the Atomicals Protocol and its ARC20 fungible token standard into Snapshot. This would allow communities building on Bitcoin using Atomicals to create and manage decentralized governance proposals, enabling token-weighted voting using ARC20 tokens. Context: The Atomicals Protocol is an emerging Layer 1 data and identity protocol built natively on Bitcoin. It expands the utility of Bitcoin by introducing programmable digital assets, including ARC20 fungible tokens, Realms (decentralized identities), and a pointer system for mutable content. The protocol is currently in a CTO/community-driven phase, and a proposal and voting system would be instrumental in coordinating decisions, funding initiatives, and evolving protocol standards through transparent community input. ARC20 tokens are similar in function to ERC20 tokens but are backed by individual satoshis 1:1, offering unique properties like fixed supply, immutable metadata, and Bitcoin-level security. These tokens are already being used across growing communities and dapps within the Atomicals ecosystem. Use Cases: Enable communities built on Atomicals to use Snapshot for off-chain governance with ARC20 tokens. Allow holders of ARC20 tokens to vote on proposals and protocol upgrades. Encourage DAO formation and token-holder participation within the Bitcoin-native asset ecosystem. Drive adoption of Snapshot in the broader Bitcoin-based Web3 landscape. Technical Considerations: Atomicals assets are managed on Bitcoin via UTXO-based state transitions. ARC20 token ownership is determined by control over specific UTXOs. Support would require: Reading balances from a Bitcoin indexer that supports Atomicals (ElectrumX indexer: https://github.com/atomicals-community/atomicals-electrumx ) Optional: Integration with Realms (RNS domains) as identities or ENS-style names. Optional: Extend support to ARC20's voting delegation or identity-linked voting through Realms. Relevant Links: Main github: https://github.com/atomicals-community Wallet: https://wizzwallet.io/ Community Website: atomicals.space X: https://x.com/AtomicalsFDN

As a growing number of users from Bangladesh and Bengali-speaking regions join the platform, having a native language option like Bengali (Bangla) would greatly enhance accessibility and user experience. It will help onboard new Web3 users who may not be fluent in English, and show inclusivity for regional communities. Even basic UI elements and onboarding steps in Bengali can make a big difference. Thanks for considering! 🇧�

Please make it available in the vote settings to turn comments on/off, or give admins the ability to hide comments. Thanks

There is currently only the option to download the data from each proposal. There is a need to use this data aggregated. Having an option to download all of the proposals at once into one file would save a lot of work.

DeSci market is expanding with newly launched projects choosing snapshot for governance decisions. however, the platform lacks a dedicated "DeSci" category. adding one would be a valuable improvement.

It would be great if discord bot alerts could be set to only ping if a proposal has been tagged with a specific label. Thanks

Via the Snapshot API, create a filter variable that can filter out successfully passed proposals. It is hard to use the 'choices' variable (together with the 'scores' variable) for this because 'choices' can contain different words and the words can be varied. I have checked with Snapshot's dev and this feature currently doesn't exists. This feature would be important because it will allow developers to separate out successful vs. failed proposals and do important analysis of what contributes to proposals being successfully passed as compared to those that had failed.

Dear Snapshot.org Team, As a proud member of the Shibarmy, I am writing to request the addition of Shibarium support on your platform. Shibarium, our Layer 2 solution and backbone of our ecosystem, is rapidly gaining unbeleashible traction within the Shib community and beyond 🫡 Thank you for considering our request. We look forward to your positive response that'd be a treat! Warm regards, Mazrael ShibArmy Member